{
  "title": "Account invitation survey",
  "questions": [
    "Who did you expect the invitation to come from?",
    "What did the invitation explain?",
    "What information would help before accepting?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "The expected sender identifies the trust and organization context recipients need to recognize an invitation. Keep identities and invitation links out of the questionnaire.",
    "The invitation explanation reveals whether recipients understood the sender, workspace purpose and joining action. Add verified context beside the actual next step, without collecting invite links or implying that every invitation grants the same permissions.",
    "Information needed before accepting identifies missing joining context, such as purpose or verified access scope. Explain actual conditions without implying that all invitations grant identical permissions."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not imply an invitation proves trustworthiness."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Include appropriate sender and organization context."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}