If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

Which feedback criterion was unclear?
What context did reviewers need?
What review structure would help?

Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable:
1. An unclear feedback criterion identifies how reviewers are uncertain about judging the draft against the brief. Clarify agreed standards rather than treating preference as objective evidence.
2. Needed reviewer context identifies the audience, purpose or constraints required to judge proposed creative work. Provide approved briefing references, without treating a preference as objective evidence or assuming feedback authorizes additional scope.
3. A useful review structure identifies how feedback should be organized around the agreed purpose and constraints. Confirm the process without treating a suggestion as authorization for more work.