# API documentation feedback survey

Improve explanations used by technical evaluators.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. Which example was difficult to follow?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What prerequisite was missing?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. What response detail needed explanation?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. A difficult example identifies the documented step or assumption readers could not follow. Use synthetic request context and avoid collecting credentials or private payloads.
2. A missing prerequisite identifies setup context required before a documented API step can be attempted. Add verified conditions and synthetic examples, without requesting credentials or presenting untested code as a supported integration.
3. A response detail needing explanation identifies output meaning or handling missing from the documentation. Add verified synthetic examples without presenting untested behavior as supported.

Interpretation caution: Never request API keys or credentials.