{
  "title": "Article source discovery survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which claim did you want checked?",
    "What reference label was unclear?",
    "What evidence link was missing?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Read for claim intent. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.",
    "Read for label meaning. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.",
    "Read for evidence gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted",
      "reason": "Read for claim intent. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted",
      "reason": "Read for label meaning. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted",
      "reason": "Read for evidence gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}