{
  "title": "Asynchronous collaboration survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which update needed a live explanation?",
    "Where do written requests lack context?",
    "What response window would help?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "An update requiring live explanation reveals what a written handoff failed to communicate. Preserve the missing context rather than judging the sender.",
    "Missing written context identifies what recipients need to interpret a request without an immediate conversation. Include the relevant purpose, constraints or next step, rather than equating more documentation with effective collaboration.",
    "A helpful response window identifies timing expectations for work across different hours. Agree appropriate urgency exceptions instead of assuming everyone can respond immediately."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Slow replies may reflect agreed working hours."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Add context and deadlines to handoff notes."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": null,
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}
