# Case study comprehension survey

Check whether a story distinguishes evidence and interpretation.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. What result does the story claim?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What context is missing?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. What source would help assess the claim?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. Use this answer to locate the part of the experience that needs explanation. The example issue to investigate is: readers cannot distinguish measured results from interview opinions.
2. Missing context reveals whether a story omits the starting situation, measurement scope or relevant conditions. Restore verified context around the outcome, rather than presenting a customer narrative as general proof of effectiveness.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: label evidence type and relevant context.

Interpretation caution: Use only approved, genuine customer evidence.