{
  "title": "Community campaign relevance survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which activity matches your interests?",
    "What participation detail is missing?",
    "What would make the invitation useful?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Connect the activity a reader selects with the interest it serves. Use that context to improve invitation relevance while keeping practical commitment and separate participation permission explicit.",
    "Missing participation details identify uncertainty about the activity, effort or next step behind an invitation. Explain actual arrangements and optional choices, without assuming interest in the message authorizes enrollment or further contact.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: explain the activity and time requirement clearly."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not infer consent from campaign interest."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Explain the activity and time requirement clearly."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}