# Community campaign relevance survey

Understand why an invitation resonates with its audience.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. Which activity matches your interests?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What participation detail is missing?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. What would make the invitation useful?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. Connect the activity a reader selects with the interest it serves. Use that context to improve invitation relevance while keeping practical commitment and separate participation permission explicit.
2. Missing participation details identify uncertainty about the activity, effort or next step behind an invitation. Explain actual arrangements and optional choices, without assuming interest in the message authorizes enrollment or further contact.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: explain the activity and time requirement clearly.

Interpretation caution: Do not infer consent from campaign interest.


## Illustrative finding and follow-up

Observation: Readers need the practical commitment before expressing interest.

Action to test: Explain the activity and time requirement clearly.

Follow-up: After trying the change, repeat “Which activity matches your interests?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: readers need the practical commitment before expressing interest. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.