{
  "title": "Community digest usefulness survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which item helped you find a discussion?",
    "What context was missing?",
    "What should the next digest include?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Find the digest item whose summary or link enabled a member to discover a useful discussion. Preserve the route that worked while investigating items that lacked context separately.",
    "Missing digest context shows why a summary item cannot be interpreted or acted upon. Add the relevant discussion purpose or link instead of making every summary longer indiscriminately.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: add a short task-focused description for each item."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not equate email opens with usefulness."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Add a short task-focused description for each item."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}