{
  "title": "Member introduction survey",
  "questions": [
    "What would you like others to know?",
    "Which introduction format feels suitable?",
    "What boundary should organizers respect?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Let the member choose which interests or context they would like to share. Use that choice to shape an optional introduction without requesting private biographical details.",
    "Format suitability helps identify optional introduction routes that members feel comfortable using. Offer the relevant choice without treating willingness to introduce themselves as permission to publish personal details.",
    "Identify limits on the detail, audience or format of an introduction before sharing it. Respect the stated boundary; participation does not authorize publication."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Avoid collecting personal details unnecessarily."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Offer optional topic-based introductions."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}
