# Community partnership feedback survey

Clarify expectations across collaborating community groups.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. Which responsibility needs explanation?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What resource expectation differs?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. What checkpoint would help?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. Use this answer to locate the part of the experience that needs explanation. The example issue to investigate is: groups disagree about who communicates schedule changes.
2. Different resource expectations reveal an unresolved contribution or dependency between community partners. Agree the relevant scope and ownership before collaboration rather than assuming goodwill implies identical commitments.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: agree a shared communication owner.

Interpretation caution: Do not disclose confidential partnership terms.


## Illustrative finding and follow-up

Observation: Groups disagree about who communicates schedule changes.

Action to test: Agree a shared communication owner.

Follow-up: After trying the change, repeat “Which responsibility needs explanation?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: groups disagree about who communicates schedule changes. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.