If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

Which rule needs an example?
What behavior boundary was unclear?
What explanation would help?

Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable:
1. Use this answer to locate the part of the experience that needs explanation. The example issue to investigate is: members interpret disagreement and harassment as the same category.
2. A behavior boundary shows where a participation rule permits competing interpretations. Describe the specific permitted or restricted behavior and an appropriate clarification route without adjudicating individual allegations.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: provide approved examples of respectful disagreement.