{
  "title": "Comparison page usefulness survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which comparison criterion matters to your task?",
    "What source would help verify a claim?",
    "What context is missing?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Identify the verified attribute that matters to the reader’s intended task so the comparison answers that decision. Date and source the evidence without inventing rankings or competitor capabilities.",
    "Requested sources reveal which comparison statements visitors cannot evaluate from the page alone. Link current primary evidence and its scope, without treating a respondent's preferred source as proof that a competitor claim is accurate.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: date and source verified comparison criteria."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not invent competitor capabilities or rankings."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Date and source verified comparison criteria."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": null,
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}