# Comparison page usefulness survey

Find information people need for a fair evaluation.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. Which comparison criterion matters to your task?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What source would help verify a claim?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. What context is missing?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. Identify the verified attribute that matters to the reader’s intended task so the comparison answers that decision. Date and source the evidence without inventing rankings or competitor capabilities.
2. Requested sources reveal which comparison statements visitors cannot evaluate from the page alone. Link current primary evidence and its scope, without treating a respondent's preferred source as proof that a competitor claim is accurate.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: date and source verified comparison criteria.

Interpretation caution: Do not invent competitor capabilities or rankings.