{
  "title": "Consulting discovery session survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which problem was clarified?",
    "What assumption remains unresolved?",
    "What should the next discussion cover?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "The clarified problem identifies the shared decision context reached during discovery. Compare interpretations without treating agreement on wording as proof of feasibility.",
    "An unresolved assumption identifies a condition that could change the proposed consulting scope or required evidence. Record it for an appropriate discussion before agreement, without promising feasibility or requesting confidential project information.",
    "A proposed next discussion identifies an unresolved decision or evidence need before scope is agreed. Keep confidential details out and confirm the appropriate participants."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not infer contractual agreement from discussion feedback."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Write a concrete decision brief."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}