If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

How clear was the agreed project scope?
Which deliverable was most useful for your next decision?
What needed more explanation or support?
Which recommendation needs an example of implementation?
Was responsibility for the next step clear at handover?

Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable:
1. Scope understanding reveals whether consultant and client share the same decision, deliverables and exclusions. Investigate mismatched expectations before changing delivery plans or assuming the client approved additional work.
2. A useful deliverable should support a concrete decision the client faces. Identify what was applied and what remained unusable; delivery speed alone cannot demonstrate practical value.
3. Missing explanation distinguishes an inaccessible recommendation from a lack of implementation support. Route the reported gap to clarification, worked examples or an agreed support conversation rather than rewriting every deliverable.
4. An implementation example can expose hidden prerequisites, sequencing or ownership in a recommendation. Choose the example around the client's intended next step; illustrative guidance does not guarantee business results.
5. Clear ownership prevents a report from ending with unassigned work. Compare the client's understanding with the handover responsibilities and clarify coordination gaps without inferring contractual acceptance.