{
  "title": "Event participation arrangements survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which planned activity needs an alternative?",
    "What arrival information would help?",
    "How should organizers explain available arrangements?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Identify the planned activity and the practical alternative needed to participate. Verify available options with organizers without requiring diagnoses or assuming one route meets every need.",
    "Requested arrival details identify concrete information that organizers can verify before publication. Clarify entrances and assistance routes as appropriate, without asking for diagnoses or treating a guide as proof of complete accessibility.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: publish verified route and contact information."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Ask about arrangements rather than diagnoses."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Publish verified route and contact information."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}