# Event participation arrangements survey

Plan practical access arrangements for attendees.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

## 1. Which planned activity needs an alternative?

Answer: ____________________

## 2. What arrival information would help?

Answer: ____________________

## 3. How should organizers explain available arrangements?

Answer: ____________________

## Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable

1. Identify the planned activity and the practical alternative needed to participate. Verify available options with organizers without requiring diagnoses or assuming one route meets every need.
2. Requested arrival details identify concrete information that organizers can verify before publication. Clarify entrances and assistance routes as appropriate, without asking for diagnoses or treating a guide as proof of complete accessibility.
3. Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: publish verified route and contact information.

Interpretation caution: Ask about arrangements rather than diagnoses.


## Illustrative finding and follow-up

Observation: Visitors need step-free route information before arriving.

Action to test: Publish verified route and contact information.

Follow-up: After trying the change, repeat “Which planned activity needs an alternative?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: visitors need step-free route information before arriving. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.