What did you expect while waiting?
Expected waiting behavior identifies the feedback users need while work remains incomplete. Compare it with actual execution stages without inventing completion estimates.
Product and software research · Practical survey guide
Understand uncertainty during slow product actions.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
BEFORE YOU INVITE PEOPLE
Local planning aid. No answers are submitted or saved.
A useful starting point
Understand uncertainty during slow product actions. Use the prompts relevant to your audience and allow people to skip situations they did not encounter. Keep response handling consistent with what you explain in the invitation.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
Expected waiting behavior identifies the feedback users need while work remains incomplete. Compare it with actual execution stages without inventing completion estimates.
The perceived stopping point identifies a gap between ongoing work and visible progress feedback. Explain the actual state and available next action, without inventing completion estimates or assuming uncertainty means execution failed.
Helpful progress information identifies the state or next check that would reduce uncertainty. Show verified pending behavior without treating a display change as proof of completion.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What did you expect while waiting? When did you think the action had stopped? What progress information would help?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Choose the response format
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What did you expect while waiting? | Optional short text | Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating. |
| When did you think the action had stopped? | Optional written explanation | Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not invent progress percentages. |
| What progress information would help? | Optional improvement suggestion | Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Show pending status and prevent duplicate submissions. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Would you agree that everything about loading feedback was clear and easy?
What did you expect while waiting?
The first wording combines an assumed positive outcome with two different judgments. The revised prompt asks about a specific experience and permits an inconvenient or uncertain answer.
Read the answers carefully
Do not invent progress percentages.
Users repeat clicks during a long-running action. This is a synthetic example, not a customer result. Do not invent progress percentages.
A worked interpretation example
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Users repeat clicks during a long-running action.
Show pending status and prevent duplicate submissions.
After trying the change, repeat “What did you expect while waiting?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: users repeat clicks during a long-running action. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.
From question to next step
Start with the decision: Understand uncertainty during slow product actions.
Invite people with relevant experience. Ask after someone has encountered the situation described in “What did you expect while waiting?”, while they can still recall the details. For material testing, show the actual draft first; for planning, ask before the next relevant activity.
Show pending status and prevent duplicate submissions.
Before you send it
Product users who attempted the described task. Ask only about steps each person encountered; do not treat a voluntary response sample as representative.
Ask after someone has encountered the situation described in “What did you expect while waiting?”, while they can still recall the details. For material testing, show the actual draft first; for planning, ask before the next relevant activity.
Users repeat clicks during a long-running action. This is an illustrative pattern to look for, not a claim about your respondents. Do not invent progress percentages.
Show pending status and prevent duplicate submissions. After trying the change, repeat “What did you expect while waiting?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: users repeat clicks during a long-running action. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.
The perceived stopping point identifies a gap between ongoing work and visible progress feedback. Explain the actual state and available next action, without inventing completion estimates or assuming uncertainty means execution failed. Use an optional written explanation when predefined choices would hide relevant context.
Copy the prompts or download TXT, CSV, JSON, or a Markdown worksheet, then adapt them in your own survey. The CTA opens registration; it does not import this example automatically. Verify available features in your account.
Build with SurveyTeams
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring