{
  "title": "Member meeting usefulness survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which agenda item helped your participation?",
    "What preparation was missing?",
    "What should the next meeting change?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Locate the agenda item that gave members enough context to contribute, then preserve its preparation or discussion format. Useful participation does not imply consent to a formal vote.",
    "Preparation gaps show why members could not participate effectively in a recurring meeting. Provide the relevant agenda context or material beforehand rather than treating attendance alone as adequate readiness.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: share approved background materials beforehand."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not infer voting consent from survey responses."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Share approved background materials beforehand."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": null,
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}