What task did the mention concern?
Read for task relevance. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Product and software research / Survey guide
Product and software research · A focused questionnaire
Mention notification context survey
Improve mention notification usefulness.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE3 prompts
Try the first three questions here. Nothing is submitted or saved.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
Do not copy confidential messages.
Mentions open the document without highlighting context. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. Do not copy confidential messages.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Improve mention notification usefulness. These prompts examine task relevance, context gap, destination usefulness. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
What context was missing?
Read for context gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Where did the notification take you?
Read for destination usefulness. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What task did the mention concern? What context was missing? Where did the notification take you?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
What task did the mention concern?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Mentions open the document without highlighting context.
Choose an action to test
Test links to the relevant discussion.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—Test links to the relevant discussion.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Mentions open the document without highlighting context.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Set the decision
Improve mention notification usefulness.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
Test links to the relevant discussion.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What task did the mention concern? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for task relevance. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What context was missing? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for context gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| Where did the notification take you? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for destination usefulness. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Product users who attempted the specific interface or workflow task; use synthetic examples without private records. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for task relevance. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Improve mention notification usefulness.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for context gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for destination usefulness. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. Do not copy confidential messages.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Test links to the relevant discussion. After testing this change—Test links to the relevant discussion.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Mentions open the document without highlighting context.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Improve mention notification usefulness.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. Do not copy confidential messages. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring