Set the decision
Improve mentoring goal discussions.
People at work / Survey guide
People at work · A focused questionnaire
Mentoring goal agreement survey
Improve mentoring goal discussions.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
EXAMPLE INVITATION BRIEF
Help us understand this experience.
Improve mentoring goal discussions.
- Who should respond
- Adult applicants, colleagues or team leaders who encountered the described arrangement; no individual evaluations
- When to ask
- Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Before sending, explain handling, optional participation, and contact details. This example is not sent by the preview.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
Agree an optional goal-review checkpoint.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
Do not disclose personal mentoring content.
Pairs omit a goal review interval. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. Do not disclose personal mentoring content.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Pairs omit a goal review interval.
Choose an action to test
Agree an optional goal-review checkpoint.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—Agree an optional goal-review checkpoint.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Pairs omit a goal review interval.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Improve mentoring goal discussions. These prompts examine agreed goal, expectation clarity, review timing. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
What goal did you agree?
Read for agreed goal. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Which expectation was unclear?
Read for expectation clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What review point was missing?
Read for review timing. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What goal did you agree? Which expectation was unclear? What review point was missing?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
What goal did you agree?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What goal did you agree? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for agreed goal. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| Which expectation was unclear? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for expectation clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What review point was missing? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for review timing. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Adult applicants, colleagues or team leaders who encountered the described arrangement; no individual evaluations. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for agreed goal. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Improve mentoring goal discussions.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for expectation clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for review timing. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. Do not disclose personal mentoring content.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Agree an optional goal-review checkpoint. After testing this change—Agree an optional goal-review checkpoint.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Pairs omit a goal review interval.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Improve mentoring goal discussions.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. Do not disclose personal mentoring content. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring