{
  "title": "Mentoring match feedback survey",
  "questions": [
    "What do you want help with?",
    "Which meeting has been most useful?",
    "What adjustment would improve the match?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "The desired help identifies the respondent's mentoring goal. Compare it with the support the pair can actually offer rather than assuming meeting frequency is the main problem.",
    "A useful meeting identifies the mentoring activity that supported a concrete next step. Compare its purpose with the pair's goals, without treating enjoyment or regular attendance as evidence of mentoring effectiveness.",
    "A proposed adjustment identifies how the pair could better align goals, expectations or practical arrangements. Agree the change with both people before testing it."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. A mismatch does not imply poor mentoring."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Agree goals and meeting cadence."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": null,
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}