Set the decision
Write down the decision you want this questionnaire to support: learn whether mentoring conversations support useful progress.
Learning and training · Practical field guide
Learn whether mentoring conversations support useful progress.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Try the first three questions here. Nothing is submitted or saved.
From question to next step
Write down the decision you want this questionnaire to support: learn whether mentoring conversations support useful progress.
Invite people who experienced the relevant situation. Explain response handling and include an optional skip or not-applicable route. Do not require details from private mentoring conversations.
Agree on a realistic cadence and end each meeting with an optional next step.
Read the answers carefully
Do not require details from private mentoring conversations.
Example participants value their mentor but struggle to agree on a meeting rhythm. This is an illustrative interpretation problem rather than a real customer result. Agree on a realistic cadence and end each meeting with an optional next step.
A worked interpretation example
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Example participants value their mentor but struggle to agree on a meeting rhythm.
Agree on a realistic cadence and end each meeting with an optional next step.
After testing the action, revisit this original observation: Example participants value their mentor but struggle to agree on a meeting rhythm. Repeat the relevant experience prompts with people who encountered the change. Compare specific explanations and sample differences; do not claim causation from the before-and-after responses.
A useful starting point
Learn whether mentoring conversations support useful progress. Choose the questions that fit the experience you are investigating; avoid asking people to evaluate a step they did not encounter.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
Check whether both participants can describe an agreed purpose for mentoring. Clarify conflicting expectations before changing the meeting schedule or interpreting participation as progress.
Locate the discussion that informed a concrete next step, preserving its useful questioning or support. A helpful conversation does not demonstrate a lasting career outcome.
Separate cadence problems from problems with meeting agendas or follow-through. Agree a feasible adjustment with both participants rather than assume more frequent meetings are preferable.
Identify practical scheduling friction, including the route used to arrange the next conversation. Address coordination barriers separately from the participant's willingness to continue mentoring.
Check whether the last discussion produced an identifiable action that the participant owns. Revisit its feasibility without requesting private disclosures from the mentoring conversation.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. How clear are the goals for your mentoring relationship? Which conversation helped you take a next step? What would improve meeting frequency or structure? How easy is it to arrange the next mentoring conversation? What practical next step came from your last discussion?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Before you send it
Would you agree that mentorship program feedback was a completely positive experience?
How clear are the goals for your mentoring relationship?
The initial wording assumes a positive evaluation. The revised question asks about the actual situation so a respondent can describe difficulty, uncertainty, or a different experience.
Choose the response format
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| How clear are the goals for your mentoring relationship? | Short open text | Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: how clear are the goals for your mentoring relationship. |
| Which conversation helped you take a next step? | Short open text | Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: which conversation helped you take a next step. |
| What would improve meeting frequency or structure? | Short open text | Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: what would improve meeting frequency or structure. |
| How easy is it to arrange the next mentoring conversation? | Short open text | Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: how easy is it to arrange the next mentoring conversation. |
| What practical next step came from your last discussion? | Short open text | Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: what practical next step came from your last discussion. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Learn whether mentoring conversations support useful progress. Start with one decision you can act on rather than using the survey to confirm a preferred answer.
Read this answer for the concrete issue behind the response. Do not require details from private mentoring conversations. Compare specific explanations instead of reducing every response to one average.
Agree on a realistic cadence and end each meeting with an optional next step. This is an example action to investigate, not a guaranteed improvement.
Ask after respondents have experienced the specific situation in the first prompt: “How clear are the goals for your mentoring relationship?” Allow enough time after a proposed change for people to experience it before repeating the questionnaire.
After testing the action, revisit this original observation: Example participants value their mentor but struggle to agree on a meeting rhythm. Repeat the relevant experience prompts with people who encountered the change. Compare specific explanations and sample differences; do not claim causation from the before-and-after responses.
Copy the questions or download TXT, CSV, JSON, or a Markdown worksheet and adapt them in your own survey. The product CTA opens registration and does not import the example. Verify the features and terms available in your account.
Build with SurveyTeams
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring