Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions.
Product and software research · A focused questionnaire
Mobile touch targets survey
Identify touch interaction difficulties.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
PLAN A BOUNDED FOLLOW-UP
Test larger separated touch targets.
After testing this change—Test larger separated touch targets.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Synthetic planning example. A repeat survey alone does not establish causation.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions.
Choose an action to test
Test larger separated touch targets.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—Test larger separated touch targets.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
Feedback does not replace accessibility testing.
Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. Feedback does not replace accessibility testing.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Set the decision
Identify touch interaction difficulties.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
Test larger separated touch targets.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Identify touch interaction difficulties. These prompts examine target difficulty, accidental action, spacing need. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
Which control was difficult to activate?
Read for target difficulty. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What neighboring action occurred instead?
Read for accidental action. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What spacing change would help?
Read for spacing need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. Which control was difficult to activate? What neighboring action occurred instead? What spacing change would help?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Which control was difficult to activate? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for target difficulty. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What neighboring action occurred instead? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for accidental action. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What spacing change would help? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for spacing need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
Which control was difficult to activate?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Identify touch interaction difficulties.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. Feedback does not replace accessibility testing. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Product users who attempted the specific interface or workflow task; use synthetic examples without private records. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for target difficulty. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Identify touch interaction difficulties.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for accidental action. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for spacing need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. Feedback does not replace accessibility testing.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Test larger separated touch targets. After testing this change—Test larger separated touch targets.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Closely placed controls trigger adjacent actions.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Continue exploring
