{
  "title": "Offer process experience survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which offer detail needed explanation?",
    "What response took longer than expected?",
    "What information would help earlier?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "An offer detail needing explanation identifies which part of the written proposal lacked clear meaning. Keep private terms out of the survey and use approved references.",
    "A delayed response reveals which clarification or administrative dependency affected the offer conversation. Explain actual contacts and next steps, without requesting private offer terms or implying that faster responses determine acceptance.",
    "Information wanted earlier identifies a gap in the offer communication sequence. Clarify when verified details can be provided without assuming that earlier disclosure guarantees acceptance."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not collect financial negotiation details."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Use a single written offer summary."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": null,
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}