{
  "title": "Pay communication clarity survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which part of the explanation was unclear?",
    "Where could you find the policy?",
    "What question remains unanswered?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "An unclear part of the explanation identifies where compensation-process wording creates uncertainty. Clarify published timing or factors without collecting individual pay details.",
    "The policy location reveals whether compensation-process explanations are discoverable through official channels. Improve the verified reference and contact route, without collecting pay amounts or interpreting policy access as agreement with compensation decisions.",
    "An unanswered question identifies information still missing after the explanation. Route it to the responsible policy owner rather than inferring compensation rights or future increases."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not collect salaries or promise adjustments."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Explain timing and decision factors separately."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}
