If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

Were your placement responsibilities clear?
Which activity helped you apply a skill?
What supervision was missing?
Which expectation should be explained before arrival?
What would improve the next placement?

Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable:
1. Role understanding determines whether a placement learner knows permitted activities and expected responsibilities. Clarify boundaries with the supervisor without collecting confidential client details or evaluating professional competence through feedback.
2. An applicable activity links the placement to practice of a specific skill. Preserve what the learner did and the context; participation alone does not demonstrate mastery.
3. Missing supervision reveals where learners lacked guidance, feedback or an available contact. Review support arrangements for the identified activity rather than judging the learner's performance.
4. Advance expectations help learners prepare for their first day and avoid assumptions about duties. Add the relevant logistical or role detail without requesting sensitive service-user information.
5. Improvement suggestions connect experience to a change in placement design. Prioritize a concrete support or practice adjustment and evaluate it separately from confidential outcomes of the work.