If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

What outcome would make this offer worth considering?
Which part of the proposed pricing is unclear?
What alternative would you compare it with?
Which part of the offer is easiest to compare with alternatives?
What information would help you assess the total commitment?

Author notes / illustrative keys where applicable:
1. Connect consideration of the offer with a desired outcome before discussing price. Perceived relevance helps interpret reactions but does not establish willingness to pay.
2. Locate uncertainty about the proposed charging structure, scope or billing conditions. Clarify those terms before interpreting reactions as evidence that the price is unacceptable.
3. Identify the alternative respondents would actually use for the same task. Compare appropriate scopes rather than assume every named competitor or workaround offers equivalent value.
4. Find an offer component respondents can compare meaningfully, such as included scope or commitment. Separate understandable comparisons from unsupported claims that one option is better.
5. Identify information needed to understand the total obligation, including relevant scope and conditions. Describe verified terms without treating estimated costs or reactions as purchase commitments.