{
  "title": "Project status update survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which decision did the update support?",
    "What risk explanation was missing?",
    "What should the next update change?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Identify the decision a progress update helped its reader make and the information used. Preserve that useful context while distinguishing it from blocked decisions and delivery evidence.",
    "A missing risk explanation reveals whether status reporting omits the condition affecting progress. Describe the known constraint and relevant next review, without treating a color or label as evidence of delivery certainty.",
    "Turn the requested improvement into a testable next step. One illustrative action is: add risks, owners, and decisions required."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not treat a status label as delivery evidence."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Add risks, owners, and decisions required."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}