{
  "title": "Recognition preferences survey",
  "questions": [
    "Before a manager shares your contribution, what information would you want about the audience and wording?",
    "Which part of the contribution should remain unattributed or private?",
    "How would you prefer to approve, change or decline the proposed acknowledgment?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Establish which audience and exact wording the person would need to review; a broad preference for praise does not authorize a particular publication.",
    "Locate the specific attribution boundary, especially when a contribution involves sensitive work. Keep the reason private rather than asking for the underlying confidential details.",
    "Make approval, revision and refusal actionable before the acknowledgment is shared. Silence or a general positive preference is not consent to the proposed wording."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Establish which audience and exact wording the person would need to review; a broad preference for praise does not authorize a particular publication.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Locate the specific attribution boundary, especially when a contribution involves sensitive work. Keep the reason private rather than asking for the underlying confidential details.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Make approval, revision and refusal actionable before the acknowledgment is shared. Silence or a general positive preference is not consent to the proposed wording.",
      "optional": true
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": {
    "send_when": "Before publishing a specific acknowledgment; ask the person whose contribution would be attributed.",
    "decision_owner": "The manager preparing the acknowledgment records the agreed scope; a communications owner checks the intended channel if necessary.",
    "followup": "Check the final wording against the person-approved version before publication, and ask afterward whether the stated boundary was respected.",
    "response_handling": "Keep individual preferences private to those preparing the acknowledgment. Do not quote sensitive examples in a team-wide report."
  },
  "editorial_sections": [
    {
      "id": "guide-decision-routes",
      "kind": "decision-routes",
      "heading": "Agree attribution before publishing",
      "intro": "Illustrative choices separate permission from a general preference for praise.",
      "rows": [
        [
          "Person approves the wording and audience",
          "Use the agreed wording in the agreed channel.",
          "Check the final version against the person-approved scope."
        ],
        [
          "Person requests a narrower attribution",
          "Remove the sensitive detail or use agreed team-level credit.",
          "Ask whether the revised wording respects the stated boundary."
        ],
        [
          "Person declines or has not replied",
          "Hold individual attribution; do not interpret silence as approval.",
          "A later acknowledgment needs a new explicit discussion."
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}