{
  "title": "Repair estimate clarity survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which proposed task needed explanation?",
    "What alternative was unclear?",
    "What evidence would help you decide?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "A proposed task needing explanation identifies work the customer cannot connect to the repair assessment. Use provider-approved scope without diagnosing the item.",
    "An unclear alternative reveals whether the estimate explains available choices and their verified scope. Refer to provider-approved assessment information, without diagnosing the item or promising that an alternative repair is feasible or safe.",
    "Evidence useful for deciding identifies the assessment reference customers need to compare proposed work. Verify its source without promising feasibility, safety or a particular result."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not give unverified technical safety advice."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Explain each verified task's purpose and scope."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}