{
  "title": "Research participation experience survey",
  "questions": [
    "Were participation requirements explained clearly?",
    "Was scheduling easy to follow?",
    "What information did you need before agreeing?",
    "Were the activities consistent with the invitation?",
    "What would improve a future invitation?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Requirement understanding shows whether recruits know what participation entails before agreeing. Clarify activities and prerequisites without treating favorable feedback as informed agreement to the research itself.",
    "Scheduling clarity determines whether participants can follow booking and attendance arrangements. Identify the relevant message or step without requesting detailed personal calendars or assuming every preferred time is available.",
    "Preagreement information reveals what participants needed to make a considered choice. Route missing details to accurate study information rather than using the survey to replace the research agreement process.",
    "Consistency between invitation and activities exposes expectation gaps in recruitment. Investigate the specific mismatch and revise future information without disclosing private participant or research material.",
    "Invitation improvements should address a concrete misunderstanding about the study or logistics. Test accurate revised wording while keeping participation voluntary and separate from formal research agreement."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: were participation requirements explained clearly.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: was scheduling easy to follow.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: what information did you need before agreeing.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 4,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: were the activities consistent with the invitation.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 5,
      "format": "Short open text",
      "reason": "Let people explain the experience in their own words. Review this answer for: what would improve a future invitation.",
      "optional": true
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}