{
  "title": "Screen reader labeling survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which control lacked a useful name?",
    "What information was announced unexpectedly?",
    "What label would clarify the action?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "A control lacking a useful name identifies an accessible label that does not communicate its action or purpose. Review its actual task context with assistive technology.",
    "An unexpected announcement identifies spoken context that differs from the control's intended purpose or state. Review accessible names and timing in the actual task, without claiming conformance from one assistive-technology observation.",
    "A clarifying label identifies wording needed to distinguish a control's action and context. Check the accessible name and behavior rather than claiming conformance from a suggested label."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Do not request disability diagnoses."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Give controls action-specific accessible names."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}