{
  "title": "Choose an inclusion rule for survey resubmissions",
  "questions": [
    "What would you expect to happen if you submitted a correction?",
    "Where should the invitation explain whether another submission replaces the first?",
    "What would you need to know before allowing a submission to be linked to an earlier one?",
    "What would you do if you were unsure whether your correction was received?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "Test the intended replacement rule without treating every repeat as abuse.",
    "Locate the disclosure needed before participation, not after a report dispute.",
    "Check understanding of linkage without collecting an identifying value in this pilot.",
    "Find uncertainty about the process rather than asking for real response content."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short open text",
      "reason": "Test the intended replacement rule without treating every repeat as abuse.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional short open text",
      "reason": "Locate the disclosure needed before participation, not after a report dispute.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional short open text",
      "reason": "Check understanding of linkage without collecting an identifying value in this pilot.",
      "optional": true
    },
    {
      "question": 4,
      "format": "Optional short open text",
      "reason": "Find uncertainty about the process rather than asking for real response content.",
      "optional": true
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "field_protocol": {
    "send_when": "Before collection, show volunteers a fabricated correction scenario and the intended replacement notice.",
    "decision_owner": "The survey owner defines the unit; the data reviewer checks the version and cutoff ledger.",
    "followup": "Use fabricated repeat cases in the next pilot and ask whether readers can explain replacement and unresolved identity.",
    "response_handling": "Keep real identifiers out of this exercise. Explain any real linkage separately and retain optional participation."
  },
  "editorial_sections": [],
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument; manual editorial data, not a product import payload."
}