{
  "example_kind": "synthetic manual decision kit",
  "layout": "changefolio",
  "heading": "Inspect the example before choosing a rule",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Synthetic pilot and reporting records",
    "headers": [
      "Invented item",
      "Raw code",
      "Direction",
      "Aligned example code"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Clear instructions",
        "4",
        "Higher agreement favourable",
        "4"
      ],
      [
        "Confusing instructions",
        "2",
        "Higher agreement unfavourable",
        "6−2=4"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "versions": {
    "original": "The raw code average is three, so the two answers disagree.",
    "revised": "For this explicitly defined five-category coding exercise, reverse the negative item with 6−x: its two becomes four. Both aligned codes are four; this does not validate averaging or a combined scale.",
    "changes": [
      [
        "Direction",
        "Raw codes treated alike",
        "Negative item direction reversed"
      ],
      [
        "Validity",
        "Matching codes prove a valid scale",
        "Coding alignment only"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "explorer": {
    "label": "Choose the evidence available for this decision",
    "options": [
      [
        "known",
        "Labels and coding direction are recorded",
        "Check the 1→5, 2→4, 3→3, 4→2, 5→1 mapping manually."
      ],
      [
        "missing",
        "Only numeric exports remain",
        "Recover labels and direction before recoding."
      ],
      [
        "composite",
        "A composite score is proposed",
        "Review construct validity and the scoring method separately."
      ]
    ]
  },
  "sources": [
    "pew"
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "pew",
      "title": "Pew Research Center question design",
      "url": "https://www.pewresearch.org/writing-survey-questions/",
      "scope": "Wording and response-option consistency."
    }
  ]
}