{
  "title": "Team conflict repair survey",
  "questions": [
    "Which agreement remains unclear?",
    "What behavior would rebuild trust?",
    "How should we revisit the agreement?"
  ],
  "question_notes": [
    "An unclear agreement identifies the remaining working boundary after a conflict discussion. Ask about observable arrangements rather than private grievances or blame.",
    "A proposed behavior identifies an observable working change rather than a demand for personal reassurance. Discuss practical agreements and follow-up boundaries, without interpreting willingness to try them as evidence that conflict is resolved.",
    "A preferred revisit method identifies a time or process for checking the agreement again. Agree participation and scope without treating the request as proof of resolution."
  ],
  "answer_guidance": [
    {
      "question": 1,
      "format": "Optional short text",
      "reason": "Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating."
    },
    {
      "question": 2,
      "format": "Optional written explanation",
      "reason": "Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. Avoid collecting accusations or private allegations."
    },
    {
      "question": 3,
      "format": "Optional improvement suggestion",
      "reason": "Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Write a shared escalation agreement."
    }
  ],
  "respondent_instruction": "If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.",
  "note": "Examples to adapt. Not a validated instrument."
}