Set the decision
Assess promotion submission clarity.
People at work / Survey guide
People at work · A focused questionnaire
Promotion evidence guidance survey
Assess promotion submission clarity.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
WHAT TO READ · WHAT TO TEST
Observation
Criteria lack examples of accepted evidence.
Interpretation boundary
No guarantee of promotion eligibility.
Next experiment
Provide approved evidence-type examples.
Illustrative scenario. These are not real response counts or findings.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
Provide approved evidence-type examples.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
No guarantee of promotion eligibility.
Criteria lack examples of accepted evidence. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. No guarantee of promotion eligibility.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Criteria lack examples of accepted evidence.
Choose an action to test
Provide approved evidence-type examples.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—Provide approved evidence-type examples.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Criteria lack examples of accepted evidence.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Assess promotion submission clarity. These prompts examine evidence meaning, criterion clarity, review discovery. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
Which evidence instruction was unclear?
Read for evidence meaning. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What criterion example was missing?
Read for criterion clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What review route did you find?
Read for review discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. Which evidence instruction was unclear? What criterion example was missing? What review route did you find?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
Which evidence instruction was unclear?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Which evidence instruction was unclear? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for evidence meaning. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What criterion example was missing? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for criterion clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What review route did you find? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for review discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Adult applicants, colleagues or team leaders who encountered the described arrangement; no individual evaluations. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for evidence meaning. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Assess promotion submission clarity.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for criterion clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for review discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. No guarantee of promotion eligibility.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Provide approved evidence-type examples. After testing this change—Provide approved evidence-type examples.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Criteria lack examples of accepted evidence.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Assess promotion submission clarity.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. No guarantee of promotion eligibility. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring