What did the information say would be recorded?
Use this answer to locate the part of the experience that needs explanation. The example issue to investigate is: participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording.
Marketing and audience research / Survey guide
Marketing and audience research · Practical survey guide
Research participation information survey
Check whether a study explains how participation works.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
QUESTION WORDING LAB
Assumes a positive answer
Would you agree that everything about research participation information was clear and easy?
Ask about the actual situation
What did the information say would be recorded?
The first wording combines an assumed positive outcome with two different judgments. The revised prompt asks about a specific experience and permits an inconvenient or uncertain answer.
A useful starting point
Questions to understand the actual experience.
Check whether a study explains how participation works. Use the prompts relevant to your audience and allow people to skip situations they did not encounter. Keep response handling consistent with what you explain in the invitation.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
What choice was unclear?
An unclear choice reveals whether participants understand optional activities, withdrawal or handling arrangements. Explain the actual procedure and available contacts, while recognizing that wording comprehension alone does not establish legally valid consent.
What contact detail would help?
Identify the verified contact route participants need for questions about the study, recording or handling choices. Make its purpose clear; access to a contact does not replace the appropriate agreement process.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What did the information say would be recorded? What choice was unclear? What contact detail would help?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What did the information say would be recorded? | Optional short text | Retain the specific point or condition described; avoid replacing it with an unexplained rating. |
| What choice was unclear? | Optional written explanation | Keep context that distinguishes different experiences. This does not replace appropriate consent processes. |
| What contact detail would help? | Optional improvement suggestion | Keep the suggested change separate from whether it has been tested. Explain actual recording and handling arrangements. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that everything about research participation information was clear and easy?
What did the information say would be recorded?
The first wording combines an assumed positive outcome with two different judgments. The revised prompt asks about a specific experience and permits an inconvenient or uncertain answer.
Read the answers carefully
Keep the conclusion within the evidence.
This does not replace appropriate consent processes.
Participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording. This is a synthetic example, not a customer result. This does not replace appropriate consent processes.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording.
Choose an action to test
Explain actual recording and handling arrangements.
Check the experience again
After trying the change, repeat “What did the information say would be recorded?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Set the decision
Start with the decision: Check whether a study explains how participation works.
Invite relevant voices
Invite people with relevant experience. Ask after someone has encountered the situation described in “What did the information say would be recorded?”, while they can still recall the details. For material testing, show the actual draft first; for planning, ask before the next relevant activity.
Choose an action
Explain actual recording and handling arrangements.
Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should receive this questionnaire?
Readers or prospective users evaluating the described material. Ask only about steps each person encountered; do not treat a voluntary response sample as representative.
When should I ask these questions?
Ask after someone has encountered the situation described in “What did the information say would be recorded?”, while they can still recall the details. For material testing, show the actual draft first; for planning, ask before the next relevant activity.
What should I investigate in the answers?
Participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording. This is an illustrative pattern to look for, not a claim about your respondents. This does not replace appropriate consent processes.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Explain actual recording and handling arrangements. After trying the change, repeat “What did the information say would be recorded?” with people who experienced it. Check whether they still describe the original issue: participants cannot distinguish notes from audio recording. Compare explanations and sample context, rather than claiming the change caused an improvement.
How should I ask “What choice was unclear?”?
An unclear choice reveals whether participants understand optional activities, withdrawal or handling arrangements. Explain the actual procedure and available contacts, while recognizing that wording comprehension alone does not establish legally valid consent. Use an optional written explanation when predefined choices would hide relevant context.
Can I use the questions in SurveyTeams?
Copy the prompts or download TXT, CSV, JSON, or a Markdown worksheet, then adapt them in your own survey. The CTA opens registration; it does not import this example automatically. Verify available features in your account.
Build with SurveyTeams
Draft your own research participation information questionnaire.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring