Which part of the programme did you attend?
Establish which parts the attendee experienced so feedback is not generalized to unvisited activities.
Events and gatherings · Practical field guide
Separate programming, facilities, and navigation concerns.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
BEFORE YOU INVITE PEOPLE
Local planning aid. No answers are submitted or saved.
A useful starting point
Separate programming, facilities, and navigation concerns. Choose the questions that fit the experience you are investigating; avoid asking people to evaluate a step they did not encounter.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
Establish which parts the attendee experienced so feedback is not generalized to unvisited activities.
Locate navigation problems around specific facilities or activities without asking for personal location history.
Find a practical improvement with an identifiable point of use rather than another broad satisfaction rating.
Check how programme changes reached attendees; availability of an updated schedule does not prove awareness.
Identify where queue or access information was missing rather than assuming the length of a queue was the only problem.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. Which part of the programme did you attend? How easy was it to find facilities and activity locations? What practical change would improve the experience? How clear were changes to the published programme? Which queue or access point needs better information?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Read the answers carefully
Use not-applicable choices for facilities a visitor did not use.
Example visitors describe enjoyable activities but confusing programme updates. This is an illustrative interpretation problem rather than a real customer result. Make schedule changes easy to find and update signs where visitors make decisions.
Before you send it
Would you agree that festival visitor feedback was a completely positive experience?
Which part of the programme did you attend?
The initial wording assumes a positive evaluation. The revised question asks about the actual situation so a respondent can describe difficulty, uncertainty, or a different experience.
A worked interpretation example
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Example visitors describe enjoyable activities but confusing programme updates.
Make schedule changes easy to find and update signs where visitors make decisions.
After testing the action, revisit this original observation: Example visitors describe enjoyable activities but confusing programme updates. Repeat the relevant experience prompts with people who encountered the change. Compare specific explanations and sample differences; do not claim causation from the before-and-after responses.
From question to next step
Write down the decision you want this questionnaire to support: separate programming, facilities, and navigation concerns.
Invite people who experienced the relevant situation. Explain response handling and include an optional skip or not-applicable route. Use not-applicable choices for facilities a visitor did not use.
Make schedule changes easy to find and update signs where visitors make decisions.
Choose the response format
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Which part of the programme did you attend? | Short open text | Establish which parts the attendee experienced so feedback is not generalized to unvisited activities. |
| How easy was it to find facilities and activity locations? | Short open text | Locate navigation problems around specific facilities or activities without asking for personal location history. |
| What practical change would improve the experience? | Short open text | Find a practical improvement with an identifiable point of use rather than another broad satisfaction rating. |
| How clear were changes to the published programme? | Short open text | Check how programme changes reached attendees; availability of an updated schedule does not prove awareness. |
| Which queue or access point needs better information? | Short open text | Identify where queue or access information was missing rather than assuming the length of a queue was the only problem. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Separate programming, facilities, and navigation concerns. Start with one decision you can act on rather than using the survey to confirm a preferred answer.
Locate navigation problems around specific facilities or activities without asking for personal location history.
Make schedule changes easy to find and update signs where visitors make decisions. This is an example action to investigate, not a guaranteed improvement.
Ask after respondents have experienced the specific situation in the first prompt: “Which part of the programme did you attend?” Allow enough time after a proposed change for people to experience it before repeating the questionnaire.
After testing the action, revisit this original observation: Example visitors describe enjoyable activities but confusing programme updates. Repeat the relevant experience prompts with people who encountered the change. Compare specific explanations and sample differences; do not claim causation from the before-and-after responses.
Copy the questions or download TXT, CSV, JSON, or a Markdown worksheet and adapt them in your own survey. The product CTA opens registration and does not import the example. Verify the features and terms available in your account.
It shows a separate synthetic event-feedback example used to demonstrate the real builder. Copy or download the questions on this page and adapt them in your own draft. Registration does not import them automatically.
Inside the product
Check the wording from an attendee’s perspective before using the draft with your event audience. The actual product screenshot shows a separate synthetic post-event demonstration; the example questions on this page are not already loaded in the product.
Screenshots demonstrate creation and preview. Distribution and results are separate steps; availability varies by account and plan.
Build with SurveyTeams
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring