Set the decision
Assess environmental claim comprehension.
Ecommerce and retail / Survey guide
Ecommerce and retail · A focused questionnaire
Product sustainability claim survey
Assess environmental claim comprehension.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE3 prompts
Try the first three questions here. Nothing is submitted or saved.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
State scope and link actual supporting evidence.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Keep the finding specific
Claims omit which product component they concern.
Choose an action to test
State scope and link actual supporting evidence.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—State scope and link actual supporting evidence.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Claims omit which product component they concern.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Assess environmental claim comprehension. These prompts examine claim scope, qualification clarity, evidence need. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
What did the claim refer to?
Read for claim scope. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Which qualification was unclear?
Read for qualification clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What evidence reference was missing?
Read for evidence need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What did the claim refer to? Which qualification was unclear? What evidence reference was missing?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What did the claim refer to? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for claim scope. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| Which qualification was unclear? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for qualification clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What evidence reference was missing? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for evidence need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
No invented environmental certification.
Claims omit which product component they concern. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. No invented environmental certification.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
What did the claim refer to?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Adult shoppers or retail service owners who encountered the described purchasing or information step. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for claim scope. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Assess environmental claim comprehension.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for qualification clarity. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for evidence need. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. No invented environmental certification.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
State scope and link actual supporting evidence. After testing this change—State scope and link actual supporting evidence.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Claims omit which product component they concern.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Assess environmental claim comprehension.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. No invented environmental certification. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Continue exploring