Keep the finding specific
Summary diagrams omit the proposed alternatives.
Mobility and public places / Survey guide
Mobility and public places · A focused questionnaire
Public consultation material survey
Evaluate consultation-material comprehension.
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
FOLLOW THE FEEDBACK
- Understand the context
What decision is being considered?
- Investigate the friction
Which explanation needed clarification?
- Choose a next check
What information would help you respond?
A planning aid, not automated analysis of your answers.
A worked interpretation example
From a comment to a practical next step.
Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.
Choose an action to test
Describe alternatives beside the summary.
Check the experience again
After testing this change—Describe alternatives beside the summary.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Summary diagrams omit the proposed alternatives.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Read the answers carefully
What these answers cannot establish.
This checks clarity, not political support.
Summary diagrams omit the proposed alternatives. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. This checks clarity, not political support.
From question to next step
Make the feedback useful.
Set the decision
Evaluate consultation-material comprehension.
Invite relevant voices
Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.
Choose an action
Describe alternatives beside the summary.
A useful starting point
Three questions for this specific decision.
Evaluate consultation-material comprehension. These prompts examine decision understanding, explanation gap, response needs. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.
What decision is being considered?
Read for decision understanding. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Which explanation needed clarification?
Read for explanation gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What information would help you respond?
Read for response needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate. What decision is being considered? Which explanation needed clarification? What information would help you respond?
Download the questions as text ↓
Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.
Choose the response format
Make room for the explanation.
| Question | Suggested format | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| What decision is being considered? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for decision understanding. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| Which explanation needed clarification? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for explanation gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
| What information would help you respond? | Optional free text; none or not applicable accepted | Read for response needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. |
Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.
Before you send it
Check what your wording assumes.
Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?
What decision is being considered?
The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.
Inside the product
Create a manual draft and check the questions
The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.
- Start a draft with this decision in mind: Evaluate consultation-material comprehension.
- Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
- Preview the respondent wording. This checks clarity, not political support. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.
Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.
Build with SurveyTeams
Adapt these questions in your own survey.
Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.
Create your survey in SurveyTeams
Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.
Learn about the product ↗Before you send it
Questions, answered.
Who should answer?
Adult visitors, travelers and service operators who encountered the described information or arrangement. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.
What does the first question help explain?
Read for decision understanding. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Evaluate consultation-material comprehension.
What should I preserve in the second answer?
Read for explanation gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
How should I read the third answer?
Read for response needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. This checks clarity, not political support.
What would a practical follow-up look like?
Describe alternatives beside the summary. After testing this change—Describe alternatives beside the summary.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Summary diagrams omit the proposed alternatives.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.
Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?
The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.
Continue exploring