Mobility and public places / Survey guide

Mobility and public places · A focused questionnaire

Station step free route survey

Evaluate step-free route communication.

Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.

Editable examplesPractical guidanceNo-code starting point

WHAT TO READ · WHAT TO TEST

Observation

Lift notices omit the alternative entrance.

Interpretation boundary

Do not solicit diagnoses or mobility histories.

Next experiment

Publish a checked alternative route.

Illustrative scenario. These are not real response counts or findings.

A worked interpretation example

From a comment to a practical next step.

Illustrative scenario. These are not customer results.

01 / OBSERVE

Keep the finding specific

Lift notices omit the alternative entrance.

02 / INVESTIGATE

Choose an action to test

Publish a checked alternative route.

03 / FOLLOW UP

Check the experience again

After testing this change—Publish a checked alternative route.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Lift notices omit the alternative entrance.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.

Read the answers carefully

What these answers cannot establish.

Do not solicit diagnoses or mobility histories.

Lift notices omit the alternative entrance. This is an illustrative pattern, not observed customer data. Do not solicit diagnoses or mobility histories.

From question to next step

Make the feedback useful.

01

Set the decision

Evaluate step-free route communication.

02

Invite relevant voices

Ask after an adult respondent has encountered this specific situation. For draft-copy testing, show the actual material first; accept none or not applicable when the issue did not occur.

03

Choose an action

Publish a checked alternative route.

A useful starting point

Three questions for this specific decision.

Evaluate step-free route communication. These prompts examine route discovery, instruction gap, diversion needs. Choose only questions your audience can answer. A missing detail can be answered with none; do not assume an issue occurred.

If nothing was unclear or difficult, say so. Skip questions about steps you did not experience; use not applicable where appropriate.

QUESTION 01

How did you locate the route?

Read for route discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.

QUESTION 02

Which route instruction was missing?

Read for instruction gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.

QUESTION 03

What diversion information did you need?

Read for diversion needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.

Download the questions as text ↓

Examples to adapt, rather than a validated research instrument.

Choose the response format

Make room for the explanation.

Suggested formats for this example questionnaire
QuestionSuggested formatWhat to preserve
How did you locate the route?Optional free text; none or not applicable acceptedRead for route discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
Which route instruction was missing?Optional free text; none or not applicable acceptedRead for instruction gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.
What diversion information did you need?Optional free text; none or not applicable acceptedRead for diversion needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.

Make questions optional where appropriate. If you add a rating scale, label its endpoints, keep one idea per question, and retain a follow-up for reasons. These examples are not a validated measurement instrument.

Before you send it

Check what your wording assumes.

BEFORE / LEADING

Would you agree that this entire experience was clear and easy?

AFTER / CONTEXTUAL

How did you locate the route?

The first wording assumes a positive outcome and combines clarity with ease. The revised prompt asks about the concrete situation; respondents may report no difficulty.

Inside the product

Create a manual draft and check the questions

The real SurveyTeams screenshot shows a separate labelled synthetic event survey. It demonstrates the manual builder, not this questionnaire already loaded and not the task described in the software being evaluated.

  1. Start a draft with this decision in mind: Evaluate step-free route communication.
  2. Copy or select only applicable questions from this page. Add them as optional text prompts; the download is an editorial definition, not a product importer.
  3. Preview the respondent wording. Do not solicit diagnoses or mobility histories. Explain your actual response handling before distribution.

Creation and preview were exercised in the observed account. Distribution, results and other features are separate workflows and depend on account conditions.

Question builder with a synthetic event feedback question and answer-type controls.
Write a free-text question. Actual SurveyTeams interface, captured 2026-10-01. Synthetic demonstration data where displayed.

Build with SurveyTeams

Adapt these questions in your own survey.

Use these examples to draft your questionnaire. Create a survey draft, add questions, and check the respondent preview in SurveyTeams. Additional features depend on your account and plan.

Create your survey in SurveyTeams

Opens product registration. Example questions are not imported automatically.

Learn about the product ↗

Before you send it

Questions, answered.

Who should answer?

Adult visitors, travelers and service operators who encountered the described information or arrangement. Ask only about the step each person actually encountered; voluntary responses are not automatically representative.

What does the first question help explain?

Read for route discovery. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. It supports this decision: Evaluate step-free route communication.

What should I preserve in the second answer?

Read for instruction gap. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score.

How should I read the third answer?

Read for diversion needs. Keep the specific explanation in the respondent’s own words rather than converting it into an unexplained overall satisfaction score. Do not solicit diagnoses or mobility histories.

What would a practical follow-up look like?

Publish a checked alternative route. After testing this change—Publish a checked alternative route.—ask people who encountered the changed arrangement whether this original issue still occurred or did not occur: “Lift notices omit the alternative entrance.” Invite a concrete explanation, including none or not applicable. Compare participant context and sample differences; a before-and-after survey alone does not establish causation.

Can I load this automatically in SurveyTeams?

The page offers text, CSV, JSON and Markdown downloads plus manual copying. Registration does not import the questionnaire. Use account-supported features and verify your own response-handling arrangements.

Continue exploring

Related feedback guides.